Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, having a 91.3 score against 79.3. The Galaxy A52 5G design is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 7 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger aperture, a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.