Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Xperia XZ3, having a 91.3 score against 79.6. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it is also thinner and just a bit lighter than Xperia XZ3. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xperia XZ3 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xperia XZ3 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 5G features better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 35% more battery size.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a bigger camera aperture and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.