Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a 91.3 score against 78.8. The Galaxy A52 5G design is just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than vivo X60 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
Vivo X60 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit lower screen pixel density and a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A52 5G has a better storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit superior battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.