Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, having a global score of 90.7 against 84.9. Samsung Galaxy A52's body is newer than Apple iPhone 11 Pro's, although it's a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. The iPhone 11 Pro has a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. Galaxy A52 has a superior camera than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A52 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A52 has a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.