Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the iPhone 8, having a 90.7 score against 85. The Galaxy A52 body is newer, but way heavier and thicker than the iPhone 8. Apple iPhone 8 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52, although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display, a really smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334px.
IPhone 8 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has lesser processing cores and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Galaxy A52 captures better photographs and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Galaxy A52 features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much longer battery life than iPhone 8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.