Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone XS Max, getting a global score of 90.7 against 84.5. Galaxy A52 is a noticeably newer and just a little lighter phone than the Apple iPhone XS Max, although it is just a bit thicker. The iPhone XS Max counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a little better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. IPhone XS Max has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Galaxy A52 has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3179mAh. Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.