Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, getting a score of 90.7 against 84.2. The Galaxy A52 design is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. The Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior performance than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 50 megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A52, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5500mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.