Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than Google Nexus 6P, getting a 90.7 score against 80.3. Galaxy A52's design is much newer, but a little bit heavier and thicker than Google Nexus 6P. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better amount of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos and a much better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A52 counts with longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.