Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than the Google Pixel 2, having a general score of 90.7 against 81.6. Galaxy A52's design is incredibly newer, but a little thicker and a lot heavier than the Google Pixel 2. Google Pixel 2 counts with a processor that's very similar to Galaxy A52's CPU, and although the Google Pixel 2 has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A52 features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.