Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 overall score. Even though the Galaxy A52 is somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel XL, it's just a little bit thinner and way newer. The Galaxy A52 features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel XL features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy A52 features a way better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video and a much larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.