Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2021-03-17 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the LG V20's 77 overall score. Even though the Galaxy A52 is a lot newer than LG V20, it's just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. LG V20 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit more memory for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much better resolution back camera and a much larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a really longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 41% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.