Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having a global score of 90.7 against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy A52's construction is noticeably newer and incredibly thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is also just a bit heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a camera in the back with a much better 64 MP resolution, faster video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture.
Galaxy A52 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.