Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G's 86.2 overall score. Even though the Galaxy A52 and the Motorola Moto G200 5G were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A52 is a bit lighter and just a little thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A52 and the Motorola Moto G200 5G both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a quite worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.