Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Motorola Moto Z4, having a 90.7 score against 79.8. The Galaxy A52 is a newer phone than Motorola Moto Z4, but it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a bit better processing power than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a little larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy A52 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with lot more MP and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features greater battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.