Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2018)'s overall score of 84.2. The Galaxy A52 body is notably newer, but a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A7 (2018). Galaxy A7 (2018) has a display that is very similar to the Galaxy A52 one, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a processing unit that is very similar to Galaxy A52's CPU, they have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A52 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Galaxy A52 features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.