Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A80, with a score of 90.7 against 84.9. Galaxy A52 is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A80. The Galaxy A80's CPU is very similar to the Galaxy A52 one, and although the Galaxy A80 has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A52 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality, a lot better resolution camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 has superior battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has a 22% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.