Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. The Galaxy A52 is a newer phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is a little heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a just a bit better pixels amount per screen inch and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A52 features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.