Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than Galaxy M30s, having a 90.7 score against 83.3. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Galaxy M30s, but it is also a bit heavier. Galaxy M30s features a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 one, although the Galaxy M30s has a little bit smaller display, a just a bit worse number of pixels per screen inch and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy A52, and although the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A52 counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has improved battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations, a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.