Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M31's 86.5 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer phone, and it's also a little lighter and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M31. The Galaxy M31 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit worse display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy M31 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a camera that is very similar to Galaxy A52's camera, they have the same sensor size, the same video frame rate, a same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.