Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9's 87.1 general score. Galaxy A52 is a much newer device, and it's also a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note9. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A52. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A52 has a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.