Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2, getting a global score of 90.7 against 79.1. The Galaxy A52 design is noticeably newer, extremely thinner and a little bit lighter than Sony Xperia XZ2. The Sony Xperia XZ2 features a little faster processor than Galaxy A52, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Xperia XZ2 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than Xperia XZ2, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.