Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Google Nexus 6P, with a overall score of 91.1 against 80.3. Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is incredibly newer than Google Nexus 6P's, although it is thicker and just a bit heavier. The Galaxy A52s counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy A52s shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52s also has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels, a bigger aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52s has superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.