Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, with a overall score of 91.1 against 83.7. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides you some extra features and optimized performance. Galaxy A52s is a a bit heavier phone than LG V50 ThinQ, but both of them are equally thin.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better amount of pixels per inch of screen. LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52s features a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG V50 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit superior battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.