Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Although the Galaxy A52s is just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and also newer.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has lesser cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots way better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and faster video frame rate.
Galaxy A52s has a superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.