Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's global score of 77.9. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Even though Galaxy A52s is a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and also a lot newer.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixel quantity per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A52s, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a greater camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a way higher resolution back facing camera, faster 30 fps video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.