Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy A52s design is newer, a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Galaxy A52s has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52s captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back and a bigger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little bit better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52s features a bit better battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.