Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. Galaxy A52s is a much newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z4, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52s has a more recent 11 version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little better screen density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52s captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a larger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A52s has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52s also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with greater battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.