Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's overall score of 79.9. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the user the same OS features. Galaxy A52s's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's just a little lighter.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216, a quite larger screen and more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A52s features more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro and Galaxy A52s count with quite similar cameras, because although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way worse 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos.
OPPO Find X3 Pro's battery life is just as good as Galaxy A52s's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.