Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Galaxy A8 Star, having a score of 91.1 against 82.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has older 11 version while Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body is extremely newer and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A8 Star's, although it is also a bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A52s has a very superior camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy A52s features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.