Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note9's 87.1 global score. The Galaxy A52s is a way newer cellphone, and it is also a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note9. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy Note9 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher screen density. The Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52s also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy A52s takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.