Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than the Xperia XZ3, having a overall score of 91.1 against 79.6. The Galaxy A52s construction is way newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xperia XZ3. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52s, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a better screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A52s takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations and a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
Galaxy A52s counts with longer battery duration than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.