Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 91.1 against 77.8. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Although Galaxy A52s is much older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a bigger screen, a little better amount of pixels in each display inch and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features superior battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 50 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.