Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a 91.1 score against 78.8. Both phones we are comparing here come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Although it's the best device in this comparison, Galaxy A52s is an a little heavier and just a little thicker device than the vivo X60 Pro.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density and a little lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy A52s features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.