Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| -- | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1480 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A55 5G's general score of 75.1. Both of these devices work with the same Android 14 operating system. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, because it has a larger display, a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A55 5G. They have a camera in the back with a 50 MP resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A55 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A55 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.