Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has a score of 78.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has 14 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) construction is incredibly lighter and way thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, higher 30 fps video frame rate and a larger camera aperture.
The Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.