Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2018-05-22 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30 is slightly better than Galaxy A6, getting a 79.1 score against 75.8. LG V30 is a just a bit lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy A6, even though they were released only a few months apart. The LG V30 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30 also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V30 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has way more pixels per inch in the display, a bit larger display and a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have a 16 mega pixels back-facing camera, the LG V30 also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
LG V30 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG V30 features a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.