Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A6's global score of 75.8. Although LG V50 ThinQ is newer than Samsung Galaxy A6, it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. LG V50 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a little bigger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and way more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition, a bigger sensor and a bigger aperture. LG V50 ThinQ features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.