Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 score. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a older, a little bit heavier and extremely thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A6. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has 4 lesser cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot greater pixels quantity per inch of screen. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The Motorola Droid Turbo has improved battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 30% bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola Droid Turbo is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.