Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than Galaxy A6, having a global score of 77.9 against 75.8. Even being the best in this comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo design is much older, a little bit heavier and a lot thicker than Galaxy A6. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and way more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Galaxy A6 counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 400 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has better battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 30 percent greater battery size. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although Motorola DROID Turbo is a better device, it is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.