Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Mystic indigo |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A6's overall score of 75.8. The Motorola Moto G Stylus design is newer than the Galaxy A6's, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Moto G Stylus counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a little bit bigger display, a much higher 1080 x 2300 resolution and a better display density.
The Moto G Stylus counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G Stylus also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Stylus takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way better video resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has superior battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A6, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.