Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 has an overall score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. The Moto Z4 construction is newer and just a bit thinner, but also a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A6. Moto Z4 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto Z4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Moto Z4 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit larger display. Motorola Moto Z4 features a very superior camera than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Moto Z4 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto Z4 features improved battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Moto Z4, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.