Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Even being the best device in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note9's construction is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A6. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a much better pixel density. Galaxy Note9 has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy Note9 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a back camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Galaxy Note9 has improved battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note9, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A6, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.