Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A6's score of 75.8. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is way newer and incredibly thinner than Galaxy A6's, but it is also much heavier. The Galaxy A6 features a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a really bigger screen and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way higher resolution camera, a much larger sensor and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 90 percent greater battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.