Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy A6, getting a 78.8 score against 75.8. Vivo X60 Pro is a a bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy A6, but they have the same thickness. Vivo X60 Pro has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a higher pixel density, a bigger display and a lot better 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro features a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.