Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than Samsung Galaxy A6, having an 85.5 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is somewhat heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A6. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A6, because it has a greater display pixels density, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a bit bigger display.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a faster processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has longer battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A6, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.