Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is slightly better than Google Pixel's 80.2 general score. Galaxy A60's body is notably newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than Google Pixel. The Galaxy A60 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels amount per inch of display. Google Pixel has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Galaxy A60, both of them have equal internal memory.
The Galaxy A60 has greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh. Galaxy A60 takes clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.