Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 has an overall score of 82.3, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's score of 80. The Galaxy A60 is a heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3, but they have the same thickness. The Google Pixel 3 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A60 counts with a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 17% bigger battery size. The Galaxy A60 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 16 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.