Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, having an 82.3 score against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A60's body is just a little thinner but heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, and both were released only 1 months apart. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide the user all the same OS features.
Galaxy A60 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A60 also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3a has a little sharper display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A60 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A60 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.