Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is a little bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. Samsung Galaxy A60's design has the same thickness than Honor 50 Pro, but it is lighter. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS. The Honor 50 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor 50 Pro features a bit better display than Galaxy A60, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels, a bit bigger display and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A60, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Honor 50 Pro features better battery duration than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.