Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a global score of 82.3, which is just a bit better than the HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has a newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, counting with some extra features. Samsung Galaxy A60's body is way newer and thinner, but also just a bit heavier than HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density. The HTC One M9 features a little better performance than Galaxy A60, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU.
HTC One M9 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a more MP back facing camera and a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A60 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A60 counts with superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.